Comments

Darla’s Writer Wednesday – One Writer’s Obstinacy — 6 Comments

  1. This might just be the journalist in me talking (extra commas take up extra column inches and ink) but I must disagree with the Oxford comma. If you like it, that is just fine. However, I refuse to believe it is in any way a necessity, like so many people seem to claim and believe. Most examples I found of the "necessity" of the Oxford comma can be fixed by rewriting or using common sense.

  2. I think it's a matter of training. The Chicago comma is more common now, as is only one space after a period. (The two spaces was from the days of using a typewriter, so anyone trained in classical typing skills will use two spaces after the period.)

    But comma style is a matter of convention, not right and wrong. It is also, however, a matter of debate.

    SOMEONE IS WRONG ON THE INTERNET! OH NOES!

    ~hugs~

    Thanks for taking the time to stop by, Lucas! It's awesome to "see" you.

  3. I agree that comma style is not right or wrong, I am just tired of seeing people (no one on here, of course) saying it is essentially necessary for proper understanding and then following up with an example that could be fixed with better sentence structure (the most famous one is the "I invited the strippers, JFK and Stalin" comic found online. It is amusing, but could also be fixed with restructuring the sentence, which would probably be the best way to handle the situation verbally, too, as I don't think vocal pauses will always help the understanding of a statement like that.

    Anyway, end of rant.

  4. Thanks so much, both of you, for the commentary. I knew that the single space saves room, which helped me accept it. ~grin~ I'm just stubborn about using the comma yet the lack is not bothersome at the same time (thank heavens). My real pet peeves are dangling modifiers. They are everywhere – commercials, newscasts, and otherwise well written literature. It drives me nuts. Oh, well. Such is life. Happy Thursday!